Josh Gad Is Nonetheless Mortified Over Disney Making Magnificence and the Beast’s ‘Solely Homosexual Second’ a Massive Deal

We’ve come a good distance since Disney’s first “exclusively gay moment” when the studio made a giant to-do about LeFou in its live-action Magnificence and the Beast—principally in a depressingly big ol’ circle, now we’re again to the Home of Mouse cutting LGBTQ+ storylines out of its media to enchantment to conservative mother and father once more. However now almost eight years later, the star on the middle of that back-patting furor is talking out on simply how shocked he was to see Disney blow it out of proportion.

“I for one actually didn’t precisely really feel like LeFou was who the queer neighborhood had been wistfully ready for,” Josh Gad stated of his position as LeFou within the movie, writing in his new memoir In Gad We Belief (by way of Entertainment Weekly). “I can’t fairly think about a Delight celebration in honor of the ‘cinematic watershed second’ involving a quasi-villainous Disney sidekick dancing with a person for half a second. I imply, if I had been homosexual, I’m certain I’d be pissed.”

And but, that’s primarily what Disney tried to do again in 2017, when Magnificence and the Beast‘s director Invoice Condon teased the second—the place LeFou dances with a male companion throughout a climactic celebratory sequence within the movie—into a serious step for Disney’s on-screen LGBTQ+ efforts, describing it (now infamously) as an “completely homosexual second” in an interview with Attitude. However in keeping with Gad, the second had barely been mentioned on-set as an explicitly deliberate second, and was by no means meant to be seen as greater than a quiet nod.

“As a result of I used to be a aspect character, I didn’t wish to out of the blue throw the burden of sexuality on this character that under no circumstances was driving the movie,” Gad writes. “However the second (as described to me) appeared innocent sufficient—a enjoyable blink-and-you’ll-miss-it little beat.”

As a substitute, Condon’s framing of the second turned it right into a media firestorm, with bigots livid on the considered two males dancing collectively (a factor that’s actually by no means occurred in a Disney film earlier than) and the studio itself to eagerly capitalize on with the ability to have a tiny speck of queer illustration on the large display. It wouldn’t be the primary time both over the following few years, as Disney seemingly managed to regurgitate that it was doing its “first overtly homosexual character” for a number of press cycles, even because the studio and its main subsidiaries barely took steps with queer characters and their presence past these throwaway acknowledgements.

“Had the viewers outlined it as a candy completely homosexual second, I might have been delighted,” Gad concludes, “however the second we pointed it out and seemingly congratulated ourselves, we had invited hell and fury.”

The extra issues change, the extra they keep the identical—though now Disney is inviting the hell and fury for its own cowardice, greater than anything.

Need extra io9 information? Try when to count on the newest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s subsequent for the DC Universe on film and TV, and all the things it’s essential find out about the way forward for Doctor Who.